top of page

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Curious about Zhang Xiangqian’s Unified Field Theory or the $1,000 Gravity Experiment?


This FAQ collects clear answers to the most common questions—from background and theory to replication, applications, and collaboration.

​

Background

Q: How did Zhang come to work on a Unified Field Theory?
A: Zhang pursued an independent line of inquiry that led him to a geometric model where space itself moves in spiral patterns. He documents the reasoning and invites external review.  For additional context, archives of Zhang’s early writings exist, but this site (unifiedfield.info) is the only official source for verified translations, publications, and media.

​

Q: Does Zhang have a traditional academic affiliation?
A: No. He works independently and publishes openly; the project relies on replication and peer scrutiny.

The Theory

Q: What is the core idea in one sentence?
A: That many physical effects can be described if space is treated as a moving, spiral-like medium, from which familiar forces and constants may emerge.

 

Q: How does this connect to Einstein or quantum theory?
A: The framework aims to conceptually bridge them; it’s a proposed geometric basis that needs independent tests to evaluate where it agrees or conflicts.

Evidence & Experiment

Q: What does the $1,000 Gravity Experiment show?
A: Using alternating electromagnetic fields, the setup produces a vortex-like effect with visible motion of test objects placed in a gap.

 

Q: Which materials were tested?
A: In sequence: raw pork skin, aluminum plate, green leaf, paper, ceramic piece, and epoxy insulating board.

 

Q: Is this proof of new physics?
A: It’s evidence to be tested—a reproducible phenomenon that the theory claims to explain. We encourage independent replication and critical analysis.

 

Q: How can a lab or maker replicate it?
A: Use the published parts list, wiring diagram, and safety notes; record high-fps video; and share raw data plus exact build details for comparison.

 

Q: What would falsify Zhang’s explanation?
A: If careful controls show the motion is fully explained by known EM forces, heating, airflow, or mechanical coupling—without needing the Unified Field Theory model.

Applications (forward-looking)

Q: Where could this matter if verified?
A: Potential applications include low-maintenance fluid pumping, materials handling, and propulsion concepts without moving parts—each requiring rigorous validation.

Openness & Critique

Q: What data are available?
A: Build notes, videos, and parameters are shared publicly. We welcome preregistered replications and will link results—positive or negative.

 

Q: How do you address skepticism?
A: By defining clear tests, publishing negative as well as positive outcomes, and inviting qualified critics to propose decisive experiments.

Publications

Q: What should a new reader start with?
A: Begin with the Popular Science Edition for an overview. For technical derivations, see the Academic Edition. A Word-for-Word Translation preserves the original phrasing.

Collaboration & Contact

Q: What kinds of collaborators are you seeking?
A: Experimentalists (in electromagnetism, fluid dynamics, and materials science), theoreticians for model checks, and media partners for transparent documentation.

 

Q: How should the media reach you?
A: For interviews, email press@unifiedfield.info. For general inquiries, contact info@unifiedfield.info.

bottom of page