top of page

Zhang Unified Field Theory

A geometric framework that treats space as a spiral-like motion; claims and demos are offered for independent evaluation and replication.

The idea in plain English

Space isn’t just empty—it behaves like a moving, spiral-like medium. If this motion is real and measurable, some familiar effects could emerge from geometry rather than being assumed. The project’s goal is to publish reasoning, make testable predictions, and invite others to try to reproduce or refute the effects.

Concept sketch of spiral motion in space.

Concept sketch of spiral motion in space.

Apparatus gap where motion is observed.

Apparatus gap where motion is observed.

Predictions & how to test them

Predictions (current working list):

  • Vortex-like region: An alternating electromagnetic setup can produce a localized region where nearby test objects show consistent motion.

  • Material-agnostic response: Under the same conditions, a variety of materials should respond (organic tissue, metals, plant matter, paper, ceramics, insulating boards).

  • Reproducibility: Independent teams following the same parameters should observe the effect within normal lab tolerances.

How to test (minimum controls):

  • Record high-frame-rate video from two angles.

  • Log frequency, voltage/current, coil geometry, gap width, and ambient conditions.

  • Control for airflow, heating, mechanical vibration, and electromagnetic forces on the materials.

  • Share raw data & build notes for review.

Relation to established physics (brief)

  • Relativity: This framework is geometric in spirit, but proposes a spiral-motion picture of space. Any agreement or conflict should be clarified by specific predictions and measurements.

  • Quantum theory: The framework does not replace quantum models; it proposes a different starting geometry that may reproduce some effects. Verification requires side-by-side comparison with conventional explanations.

What would count against the hypothesis

  • If careful controls show the observed motion is fully explained by known EM forces, heating, airflow, or mechanical coupling, the spiral-motion explanation is unnecessary.

  • If independent replications following the same parameters repeatedly fail, that weakens the claim.

  • If the model mis-predicts quantitative outcomes when tested, it must be revised or rejected.

Technical resources

Calls to Action

Quick answers

  • Is this peer-reviewed? Parts are preprints; formal review and independent tests are invited.

  • How do I replicate the demo? Use the parts list and safety notes in the Experiment Guide.

  • What materials respond? Tests have shown motion with organic tissue, metals, plant matter, paper, ceramics, and insulating boards.

Link: See full FAQ → /faq

bottom of page